🔗 Share this article

Around the globe, nations are channeling massive amounts into the concept of “sovereign AI” – developing national artificial intelligence models. From the city-state of Singapore to Malaysia and Switzerland, countries are vying to create AI that grasps regional dialects and cultural nuances.

The Global AI Competition

This trend is part of a broader global contest dominated by major corporations from the America and the People's Republic of China. Whereas companies like OpenAI and Meta pour enormous capital, middle powers are additionally placing independent investments in the artificial intelligence domain.

But amid such vast sums in play, can smaller nations attain meaningful benefits? According to an expert from a prominent research institute, If not you’re a rich government or a large company, it’s a significant burden to create an LLM from the ground up.”

Security Considerations

Numerous nations are reluctant to use external AI technologies. In India, as an example, Western-developed AI solutions have sometimes fallen short. An illustrative case featured an AI agent employed to educate students in a remote area – it spoke in English with a strong US accent that was nearly-incomprehensible for local users.

Additionally there’s the defence factor. In the Indian military authorities, relying on certain foreign AI tools is considered unacceptable. Per an entrepreneur explained, “It could have some random data source that might say that, for example, a certain region is not part of India … Using that certain system in a defence setup is a serious concern.”

He further stated, I’ve discussed with experts who are in the military. They want to use AI, but, setting aside specific systems, they don’t even want to rely on American systems because data may be transferred overseas, and that is absolutely not OK with them.”

Homegrown Efforts

As a result, a number of states are supporting local initiatives. An example such a initiative is being developed in India, where an organization is striving to develop a national LLM with government backing. This initiative has allocated approximately $1.25bn to machine learning progress.

The founder envisions a system that is less resource-intensive than top-tier tools from Western and Eastern corporations. He explains that the nation will have to offset the funding gap with skill. Based in India, we do not possess the option of pouring massive funds into it,” he says. “How do we compete with such as the enormous investments that the United States is investing? I think that is where the core expertise and the strategic thinking comes in.”

Local Focus

Throughout the city-state, a government initiative is supporting machine learning tools educated in local local dialects. These particular languages – for example Malay, Thai, Lao, Indonesian, the Khmer language and more – are commonly poorly represented in Western-developed LLMs.

It is my desire that the people who are building these independent AI systems were aware of just how far and just how fast the cutting edge is progressing.

A senior director engaged in the initiative says that these models are designed to enhance bigger AI, instead of displacing them. Platforms such as a popular AI tool and another major AI system, he states, commonly struggle with local dialects and culture – interacting in stilted Khmer, for example, or suggesting non-vegetarian meals to Malaysian users.

Building native-tongue LLMs allows local governments to code in cultural nuance – and at least be “knowledgeable adopters” of a powerful tool developed overseas.

He continues, I am cautious with the word national. I think what we’re trying to say is we aim to be more adequately included and we aim to grasp the features” of AI technologies.

Cross-Border Partnership

Regarding nations trying to establish a position in an growing international arena, there’s another possibility: join forces. Experts connected to a well-known policy school recently proposed a government-backed AI initiative distributed among a alliance of developing countries.

They refer to the project “a collaborative AI effort”, drawing inspiration from the European productive strategy to create a competitor to Boeing in the mid-20th century. Their proposal would see the creation of a state-backed AI entity that would merge the resources of different states’ AI programs – such as the UK, the Kingdom of Spain, Canada, Germany, Japan, Singapore, the Republic of Korea, the French Republic, the Swiss Confederation and Sweden – to develop a competitive rival to the US and Chinese leaders.

The main proponent of a report setting out the proposal states that the idea has gained the consideration of AI officials of at least three countries to date, as well as several sovereign AI organizations. While it is now centered on “developing countries”, developing countries – the nation of Mongolia and Rwanda for example – have also shown curiosity.

He comments, “Nowadays, I think it’s simply reality there’s less trust in the promises of this current US administration. Individuals are wondering like, can I still depend on these technologies? Suppose they choose to