🔗 Share this article

Established political parties are increasingly allowing the radical right to set the political agenda, according to a recent research conducted in the Federal Republic of Germany.

Academics found that this phenomenon has unwittingly benefited far-right parties by legitimising their viewpoints and disseminating them more widely.

Analysis Drawing from Over 20 Years of News Reporting

The findings, published in the academic journal on political studies, relied on an computerized content review of over 520,000 articles from six national newspapers.

Capital-based scholars observed that as the far right shifted from fringe issues in the 1990s era to central themes like integration and immigration, established political groups increasingly adapted their communication in reaction.

This adaptation boosted the dissemination of these concepts and indicated to the electorate that such stances were legitimate.

Implications for Democratic Systems

"Public communication by established political groups plays a central role in the voting performance of the far right," explained a expert in political behavior involved in the research.

"This element has been underestimated," she noted.

The effect was evident even when conventional parties were condemning the radical faction. "You're still giving them attention," the researcher commented. "The main point is that because we live in such a struggle for visibility, this focus is crucial."

Mainstreaming Effect Throughout Europe

While the study was centered around the German context, this normalisation effect is probable to affect countries throughout the European continent.

"You see this a lot in European media," said another co-author. "The far right makes a statement and everybody starts talking about it for one week."

"Although you're opposing it, you're echoing it," he stated.

Hardening of Public Discourse

At times, political figures have also toughened their language to match that of the far right.

In a recently published discussion, a then German chancellor called for large-scale expulsions and urged them to happen "more frequently and rapidly."

Comparable instances can be found across Europe, as elected officials from nations ranging from the UK to the French Republic embrace the rhetoric of the far right, especially on immigration.

This has formed an echo chamber that was inconceivable a ten years prior.

Central Problem: Who Dictates the Agenda?

"{If you're a centrist political group and you are discussing societal topics – migration, assimilation – in a way that is determined by the pace of the radical right, that's the essence of agenda setting," explained a study author.

Other parties have gone one step further, seeking to copy the strict platform of the far right, despite studies indicates that this approach leads voters to vote for the far right.

Progressive Influence and Public Perception

The scope of data collected revealed that the influence of far-right parties had been gradual and had grown over time.

"Voter awareness doesn't change from one day to another," stated a researcher. "But if you hear this pessimistic narrative around immigration every second week, and it is being disseminated not only by radical groups but also, for example, by established parties, then of course this storyline gains more traction."

Need for Established Groups to Carve Out Their Distinct Narratives

The study highlighted the necessity for mainstream political parties to carve out their own discourses, especially on subjects such as immigration and assimilation, rather than continuously trailing after the radical right.

"It resembles a choreography," explained one researcher. "If the conductor is radical and you're reacting to it, you lose the ability to choose which tune should be heard."